We know the secret of your success
Introduction
Global warming is a major issue that will lead to several harms such as extreme weather conditions and sea-level rise (Peter, 2018). Increase in fossil fuel use results in high carbon dioxide emissions and contributes significantly to global warming. Measures to reduce fossil fuels use are under way for the past few decades via renewable energy development such as solar, wind, hydro and biofuels (Iqbal et al., 2019). While other energy forms could replace the fossil fuels in several sectors, higher fossil fuel energy use in transport sector could only be reduced by few substitution options among which biofuels are the most promising (Leiserowitz et al., 2020). With increase in policy reforms in the transport sector to replace fossil fuels by biofuels, there has been a tremendous interest in the development of biofuels across the world for the past two decades (Andersson et al., 2020).
Biofuel use has shown a significant decline over time. More than 20 years ago, biofuel was depicted and championed to be the hope of renewable energy development. The Americas and Europe were significantly the largest producers of feedstock for biofuels during that time (Ruan et al., 2019). Everything changed at the turn of the 2010s when there was a major inflation in the cost of biofuel feedstock, leading to global outrage against the use of food sources as a means to satisfy the energy demand. Thus began debates on whether it is reasonable to use food substitutes as sources of renewable energy (Alizadeh et al., 2020).
Further technology development resulted to mass production and, of course more oil consumption. Disaster reduction or even checkout fossil fuel resources threatening the whole world in near future. In other side oil combustion increases greenhouse gases, Ozone layer depletion and environmental pollutants such as unburned hydrocarbons (UHC), Nitrogen compounds (NOx), Carbon monoxide (CO), Carbon dioxide (????????2) and of course respiratory disorders in large cities. In addition, dependency of consuming countries to oil exporting countries greatly increased and caused oil price boosting (Bos and Gupta, 2018).
Biofuels could be majorly derived from edible oil seed crops such as sunflower, palm, rapeseed, soybean, coconut, etc. which are considered as first-generation feedstock for biofuel production (Giakoumis, 2018). However, use of such feedstock for biodiesel production has received numerous backlash due to the fact that they compete with food production. The non-edible seed crops of various plants and waste cooking oil, grass, grease, animal fats, etc. have gained recent significance as second generation feedstock for the production of biofuels (Araujo et al., 2017). However, these logical substitutes are not entirely sufficient to meet the global renewable energy demands (Negm et al., 2017).
Thus, the third generation biofuels, which are derived from micro- and macro-algae have an edge over the previous two categories and the fourth generation biofuels are based on metabolic engineering of water flora, with a potential of fixing significant amounts of atmospheric Carbon dioxide when producing about a ton of biomass (Chowdhury and Loganathan, 2019).
There is a recent global shift towards microalgae as a third generation feedstock. This viability has been demonstrated in its high photosynthetic efficiency and significantly large biomass production. Microalgae do not compete for areas of vegetation and are quite prolific even under harsh geographical conditions (Nanda et al., 2018). Global renewable energy research efforts have been concentrated on increasing the lipid content in microalgae and the effective culturing of algae. In order to establish the potential of microalgae biomass as an alternative for the production of biofuels, more concentrated attempts are needed for detailed characterization of algae biomass, algae oil and algae biodiesel as very little information in literature is available on the same (Chowdhury et al., 2019).
The present study deals with three different species of algae i.e. Chlorella, Spirulina and pond water algae in order to assess their potential for biodiesel production. The natural pond water algae biomass is expected to be a cheaper feedstock for biodiesel production as compared to pure cultures of Chlorella and Spirulina (Khoo et al., 2019). The growth patterns of the three algae species would be studied with the aim of determining the maximum productivity of algae species (Mu et al., 2017). The algae biofuel production would be attempted via oil extraction and transesterification both in single stage and two stage reactor units in order to get the maximum biodiesel yield (Yew et al., 2019). The present work would investigate the usefulness of techniques like FTIR, NMR, GC and proximate and elemental analyses to understand the chemical properties of algae biomass, algae oil and algae biodiesel. The fuel properties of algae biodiesel would also be investigated (Loftus and Johnson, 2017). The results would then be compared with that of karanja biodiesel and conventional diesel in order to establish the potential of algae biomass for biodiesel production (Laurens et al., 2017).
Problem Statement
The reason for the study is to find an alternative source of fuel instead of the non-renewable sources. The use of non-renewable sources are the major sources of the extreme weather conditions and the rise in the sea level (Carneiro et al., 2017). Algae is a third-generation biofuel and the reason for choosing it as a source of biofuel is that it is abundant in the environment and its replacement of the first and second-generation biofuels (Tu et al., 2017). The presence of algae poses as a threat to the growth of plants in the water bodies as a result of algal blooms. Therefore, there is no threat to the environment by using algae as a source of biofuel (Baudry et al., 2018).
The characterization and analysis of algae and biofuel products and also its comparison to conventional diesel and many other algae species (Pal et al., 2019).
Aim and Objectives
The aim of this study is to analyze and characterize algae and biofuel products with the following objectives;
Research Questions
The identified research questions for this project are provided below:
Deliverables
The deliverables of these project are a project report, samples of the synthesized products and gotten results. The synthesized products would be tested according to industry standards and literature to see how they compare with required standards. Also, the report should contain a complete documentation of how the laboratory experiment was carried out, how the various algae biomass and biofuel products were characterized, how various process variables were gotten, how the desired products were synthesized and how the results were arrived at.
Relevance
The global craving for bioenergy as replacement for petroleum fuel on the grounds of sustainability, renewability and carbon neutral alternative cannot be realistically achieved with the use of oil crops (Kumar et al., 2020). Oil-rich microalgae have been reported by many to be a promising alternative source of lipids for biofuel production (Varela et al., 2020).
This study is majorly focused on characterizing certain algae species as a viable source of third generation biofuel production (Elegbede et al., 2017).
Methodology
This project focuses on secondary research, laboratory experiments and process analysis, and they are discussed below:
Secondary research
The secondary research in this project will utilize a systematic approach (Johnson et al., 2016) to review the works of literature. The steps involved in the systematic review of the literature are provided below:
Laboratory experiments
The laboratory experiments would cover a large chunk of this project. They would be carried out in stages, and as such described below;
Process Analysis
The totality of the process reaction would be analyzed and this would also occur in stages;
Evaluation
The risk assessment conducted for this project is provided in the table below:
Table 1: Risk assessment
Risk
Impact
Mitigation Plan
Inability to meet the deadline
Low
Get an extension from the supervisor in due time
Inability to get required process inputs
High
Refer to municipalities, research institutes and laboratory technicians for help
Inability to develop the process set up
Refer to laboratory technicians for help
Insufficient data
Refer to journals and textbooks for help
Schedule
Table 2: Project Plan
Task Name
Start Date
End Date
Duration (Days)
Initial Research
23/09/2021
07/10/2021
14
Proposal
28/10/2021
21
Secondary Research
07/12/2021
40
Introduction Chapter
12/12/2021
5
Literature Review Chapter
05/01/2022
24
Methodology Chapter
17/01/2022
12
Sourcing of Required Feedstock
15/03/2022
60
Presentation 1
23/03/2022
8
Laboratory Experiments
06/04/2022
Evaluation of Gotten Results
13/04/2022
7
Discussion Chapter
23/04/2022
10
Evaluation Chapter
28/04/2022
Conclusion Chapter
30/04/2022
2
Project Management Chapter
01/05/2022
Abstract and Report compilation
03/05/2022
Report Proofreading
13/05/2022
Presentation 2
23/05/2022
References
Alizadeh, R., Lund, P.D. and Soltanisehat, L., 2020. Outlook on biofuels in future studies: A systematic literature review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 134, p.110326.
Andersson, V., Heyne, S., Harvey, S. and Berntsson, T., 2020. Integration of algae?based biofuel production with an oil refinery: Energy and carbon footprint assessment. International Journal of Energy Research, 44(13), pp.10860-10877.
Araújo, K., Mahajan, D., Kerr, R. and Silva, M.D., 2017. Global biofuels at the crossroads: an overview of technical, policy, and investment complexities in the sustainability of biofuel development. Agriculture, 7(4), p.32.
Baudry, G., Macharis, C. and Vallée, T., 2018. Can microalgae biodiesel contribute to achieve the sustainability objectives in the transport sector in France by 2030? A comparison between first, second and third generation biofuels though a range-based Multi-Actor Multi-Criteria Analysis. Energy, 155, pp.1032-1046.
Bos, K. and Gupta, J., 2018. Climate change: the risks of stranded fossil fuel assets and resources to the developing world. Third World Quarterly, 39(3), pp.436-453.
Carneiro, M.L.N., Pradelle, F., Braga, S.L., Gomes, M.S.P., Martins, A.R.F., Turkovics, F. and Pradelle, R.N., 2017. Potential of biofuels from algae: Comparison with fossil fuels, ethanol and biodiesel in Europe and Brazil through life cycle assessment (LCA). Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 73, pp.632-653.
Chowdhury, H. and Loganathan, B., 2019. Third-generation biofuels from microalgae: a review. Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry, 20, pp.39-44.
Chowdhury, H., Loganathan, B., Mustary, I., Alam, F. and Mobin, S.M., 2019. Algae for biofuels: The third generation of feedstock. In Second and Third Generation of Feedstocks (pp. 323-344). Elsevier.
Elegbede, I., Matemilola, S., Kies, F., Fadeyi, O., Saba, A., De Los Rios, P., Adekunbi, F., Lawal-Are, A. and Fashina-Bombata, H., 2017. Risk analysis and development of algae biofuel from aquatic and terrestrial systems. Energy Procedia, 128, pp.324-331.
Giakoumis, E.G., 2018. Analysis of 22 vegetable oils’ physico-chemical properties and fatty acid composition on a statistical basis, and correlation with the degree of unsaturation. Renewable energy, 126, pp.403-419.
Iqbal, A., Zan, F., Liu, X. and Chen, G.H., 2019. Integrated municipal solid waste management scheme of Hong Kong: a comprehensive analysis in terms of global warming potential and energy use. Journal of Cleaner Production, 225, pp.1079-1088.
Johnson, D., Deterding, S., Kuhn, K.A., Staneva, A., Stoyanov, S. and Hides, L., 2016. Gamification for health and wellbeing: A systematic review of the literature. Internet interventions, 6, pp.89-106.
Khoo, C.G., Dasan, Y.K., Lam, M.K. and Lee, K.T., 2019. Algae biorefinery: Review on a broad spectrum of downstream processes and products. Bioresource technology, 292, p.121964.
Kumar, M., Sun, Y., Rathour, R., Pandey, A., Thakur, I.S. and Tsang, D.C., 2020. Algae as potential feedstock for the production of biofuels and value-added products: Opportunities and challenges. Science of the Total Environment, 716, p.137116.
Laurens, L.M., Chen-Glasser, M. and McMillan, J.D., 2017. A perspective on renewable bioenergy from photosynthetic algae as feedstock for biofuels and bioproducts. Algal Research, 24, pp.261-264.
Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E., Rosenthal, S., Kotcher, J., Bergquist, P., Gustafson, A., Ballew, M.T. and Goldberg, M., 2020. Politics and global warming: november 2019.
Loftus, S.E. and Johnson, Z.I., 2017. Cross-study analysis of factors affecting algae cultivation in recycled medium for biofuel production. Algal Research, 24, pp.154-166.
Mu, D., Ruan, R., Addy, M., Mack, S., Chen, P. and Zhou, Y., 2017. Life cycle assessment and nutrient analysis of various processing pathways in algal biofuel production. Bioresource technology, 230, pp.33-42.
Nanda, S., Rana, R., Sarangi, P.K., Dalai, A.K. and Kozinski, J.A., 2018. A broad introduction to first-, second-, and third-generation biofuels. In Recent advancements in biofuels and bioenergy utilization (pp. 1-25). Springer, Singapore.
Negm, N.A., Abou Kana, M.T., Youssif, M.A., Mohamed, M.Y., Biresaw, G. and Mittal, K.L., 2017. Biofuels from Vegetable Oils as Alternative Fuels: Advantages and Disadvantages290. In Surfactants in Tribology (pp. 289-367). CRC Press.
Pal, P., Chew, K.W., Yen, H.W., Lim, J.W., Lam, M.K. and Show, P.L., 2019. Cultivation of oily microalgae for the production of third-generation biofuels. Sustainability, 11(19), p.5424.
Peter, S.C., 2018. Reduction of CO2 to chemicals and fuels: a solution to global warming and energy crisis. ACS Energy Letters, 3(7), pp.1557-1561.
Photaworn, S., Tongurai, C. and Kungsanunt, S., 2017. Process development of two-step esterification plus catalyst solution recycling on waste vegetable oil possessing high free fatty acid. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification, 118, pp.1-8.
Ruan, R., Zhang, Y., Chen, P., Liu, S., Fan, L., Zhou, N., Ding, K., Peng, P., Addy, M., Cheng, Y. and Anderson, E., 2019. Biofuels: introduction. In Biofuels: Alternative feedstocks and conversion processes for the production of liquid and gaseous biofuels (pp. 3-43). Academic Press.
Tu, Q., Eckelman, M. and Zimmerman, J., 2017. Meta-analysis and harmonization of life cycle assessment studies for algae biofuels. Environmental science & technology, 51(17), pp.9419-9432.
Varela Villarreal, J., Burgués, C. and Rösch, C., 2020. Acceptability of genetically engineered algae biofuels in Europe: opinions of experts and stakeholders. Biotechnology for biofuels, 13, pp.1-21.
Yew, G.Y., Lee, S.Y., Show, P.L., Tao, Y., Law, C.L., Nguyen, T.T.C. and Chang, J.S., 2019. Recent advances in algae biodiesel production: from upstream cultivation to downstream processing. Bioresource Technology Reports, 7, p.100227.
Last updated: Dec 01, 2021 05:26 PM
Your one-stop website for academic resources, tutoring, writing, editing, study abroad application, cv writing & proofreading needs.